13 Ohio App. 3d 174 - Davis v. Connor’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1993
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Zavatsky v. Stringer · Rummel v. Flowers · Smith v. Krouse · Robinette v. Daugherty · Weisenburger v. Central Foundry Div., General Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Thus, R.C. 4123.519 is not meant to prevent appeals regarding the various effects of a single work-related accident or whether a person does or does not qualify for participation in the Workers’ Compensation Fund. What the statute is meant to prevent are appeals related solely to the amount of compensation a claimant is to receive for a certain injury-””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.