13 Ohio App. 3d 226 - State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “* * * where the restraint is prolonged, the confinement is secretive, or the movement is substantial so as to demonstrate a significance independent of the other offense, * * *”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Skaggs · State v. Terry

2. “In determining whether a kidnapping offense in violation of R.C. 2905.01 (A) (4) is merged with an ensuing rape offense in violation of R.C. 2907.02 (A) (1), for purposes of application of R.C. 2941.25, the issue is whether the movement of the victim is substantial or the restraint of liberty is for a significant period of time so as to demonstrate a significant independence of the rape offense.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Steen

3. “Separate conduct was involved in the two offenses sufficiently to permit separate convictions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Steen