13 Ohio App. 3d 27 - State v. Geraldo’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

138

cited by 138 later decisions

states following

December 2022

most recently cited

138 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably State v. Myers (2002), 108 Ohio App. 3d 598 - State v. Mays (1996)

138 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Singer · State v. Pachay · State v. Mincy · State v. Lee · State v. Pudlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“(1) that the granting of a continuance must be recorded by the trial court in its journal entry; (2) that the journal entry must identify the party to whom the continuance is chargeable; and (3) that if the trial court is acting sua sponte, the journal entry must so indicate and must set forth the reasons justifying the continuance.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Glass, Unpublished Decision (8-23-2004) · State v. Beair
“[o]nce such a demonstration has been made, the burden shifts to the state to prove `that actions or events chargeable to the [defendant], under the various subsections of R.C. 2945.72 , extended or tolled enough time to leave less than [ninety] days remaining when [the defendant's motion] to dismiss [was] filed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Waits, Unpublished Decision (2-22-2005) · State v. Gaines, Unpublished Decision (6-30-2004)
“issues (constitutional or otherwise) which are neither raised in nor reached by the lower court will not be passed upon by this court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Robinson, L-06-1205 (7-13-2007) · J A, Inc. v. Francis, Unpublished Decision (3-5-2004)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.