13 Ohio App. 3d 271 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2023
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · North Carolina v. Alford · United States v. MacDonald · City of Westlake v. Cougill · 60 Ohio App. 2d 374 - State v. Kidd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant’s waiver did not specify a time limit for trial. In such a situation, the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution requires that the trial must be commenced within a reasonable time. See United States v. Mac Donald (1982), 456 U.S. 1 ; Barker v. Wingo (1972), 407 U.S. 514 . “Appellant’s case went forward nine months after his arrest. Where trial has been commenced approximately one year after arrest, the delay has been held to be ‘not presumptively prejudicial. ’ State v. Rogers (May 26, 1983), Cuyahoga App. No. 45684, unreported. Appellant has not demonstrated, nor otherwise proffered for the record, any prejudice resulting from the time period which followed his speedy trial waiver.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.