Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Ohio App. 3d 282 - State v. Gotsis

13 Ohio App. 3d 282 - State v. Gotsis’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2013

20 state decisions

1001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Livingston v. Texas · United States v. Haldeman · Porter v. United States · United States v. Green · United States v. Skillman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In order to be admissible, audio recordings must be authentic, accurate and trustworthy. * * * Admission into evidence of tape recordings containing inaudible portions is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court. * * * In determining whether to admit tape recordings, the trial court must assess whether the unintelligible portions are so substantial as to render the recordings as a whole untrustworthy. * * *" State v. Gotsis (1984), 13 Ohio App. 3d 282, 283 . (Citations omitted.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.