Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Ohio App. 3d 382 - Penwell v. Taft Broadcasting Co.

13 Ohio App. 3d 382 - Penwell v. Taft Broadcasting Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 106 Ohio App. 3d 313 - Wall v. Firelands Radiology, Inc. (1995), 100 Ohio App. 3d 313 - Climaco, Seminatore, Delligatti & Hollenbaugh v. Carter (1995)

3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

1201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sustin v. Fee · 2 Ohio App. 3d 377 - Strutner v. Dispatch Printing Co. · 574 F. Supp. 10 - Jackson v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statement constitutes hearsay as defined in Evid.R. 801(C), is inadmissible as provided by Evid.R. 802, and fails to qualify as an exception to the hearsay rule as provided in Evid.R. 803. As such, the statement could not be considered by the trial court in ruling on the motion for summary judgment. Civ.R. 56(E).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.