13 Ohio App. 3d 52 - State v. Mattox’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 152 Ohio App. 3d 311 - State v. Samatar (2003), 120 Ohio App. 3d 457 - State v. Earle (1997)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 5 Ohio App. 3d 92 - State v. Howell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“between the weight description and the dosage description in R.C. 2925.01 requires the state to prove either weight or dosage in determining whether the controlled substance was in excess of the bulk amount, but not both). {¶ 48} Brooklyn Riordan, a laboratory analyst with BCI, testified, in relevant part. that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.