13 Ohio App. 3d 85 - State v. Parks’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2022
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jacobellis v. Ohio · Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc. · 153 Ohio St. 367 - State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Savord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“while we have great respect for tasks performed by the numerous clerical staffs of the various state agencies and offices, to say that each is Fairfield County, Case No. 21-CA-23 5 a “public official” performing “official functions” for the purposes of R.C. 2921.13(A)(3) would be to stretch the reach of that statute beyond logic and reason.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Geer“It is a basic rule of statutory construction that where sections of a statute are in pari materia, they shall be construed together so as to give full force and effect to the legislative intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.