Olds v. Cary’s Empirical Analysis
1886
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 1945 · most notably Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co. (1917), Oregon & Cal. R. R. v. Jackson County (1901)
2 federal appellate · 6 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oelrichs v. Spain · Andrews v. . the Glenville Woolen Co. · Bustamente v. Stewart · Oliphint v. Mansfield & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that the injunction was wrongful, or without sufficient cause, should have been alleged. The dissolution of it by the court was evidence of its being wrongful, and should have been introduced as evidence, and not alleged as 'the substantive fact. A moment’s reflection will convince an attorney that this view is correct.” In Large v. Steer, 121 Pa. 39 , 15 A. 490 , 491, it is said:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Janssen v. Shown““It is not reasonable to require a party, because he obtained a writ of injunction staying the defendant in the suit from doing the threatened acts during its pendency, to pay the defendant’s attorney’s fees for defending the suit. The defendant was put to that expense in consequence of the suit, and not on account of the temporary injunction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kern v. Gentner““ * * the respondent in this case should only have been allowed counsel fees for preparing and making the motion to dissolve the injunction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kern v. Gentner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.