Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Or. 428

Steel v. Rees

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1886

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1886-05-19

<p>Appeals prom Justice’s Court. — The Circuit Court acquires no jurisdiction over an appeal from a Justice’s Court, unless the statute providing therefor is strictly pursued.</p> <p>Same — Jurisdiction on — Void Judgment. — Where an appellant takes the preliminary steps entitling him to enter the cause in the Circuit Court, but neglects so to do, the respondent cannot perfect the appeal by filing the transcript in the Circuit Court, and any action of the latter court upon a transcript so filed is a nullity.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1917

1 district · 1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““In this case the appellant, after giving notice and filing an undertaking which entitled him to enter the cause in the circuit court, took no further steps to perfect the appeal. The respondent had no power to do what the appellant alone could do—carry forward the appeal into the circuit court. The action of the respondent in filing the transcript in the circuit court was wholly without authority of law and void. The action of the circuit court upon such filing was a nullity.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including O'Connor v. Beck

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed, · Decided 1886-05-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1An appeal from a Justice’s Court to the Circuit Court for the purpose of a trial anew in the Circuit Court is wholly a statutory proceeding. It follows that the Circuit Court acquires no jurisdiction over the appeal unless the provisions of the statute providing for the appeal are complied with, and it shall so appear on the face of the proceedings.

¶2In this case the appellant, after giving notice and filing an undertaking which entitled him to enter the cause in the Circuit Court, took no further steps to perfect the appeal. The respondent had no power to do what the appellant alone could do — carry forward the *429appeal into the Circuit Court. The action of the respondent in filing a transcript in the Circuit Court was wholly without authority of law and void. The action of the Circuit Court upon such filing was a nullity. The respondent at most could only have an action on the undertaking for damages suffered by the stay of proceedings that had been produced.

¶3The judgment must be reversed.

/13/or/428 · .json · Public domain