Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 P.3d 175 - State v. Johnston

State v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Litherland · Mannhalt v. Reed · State v. Templin · State v. Tennyson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A party to an appeal in a criminal case may move the court to remand the case to the trial court for entry of findings of fact, necessary for the appellate court's determination of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(tlhe purpose of Rule 28B is for appellate counsel to put on evidence he or she now has, not to amass evidence that might help prove an ineffectiveness of counsel claim.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “alleging facts not fully appearing in the record on appeal that show the claimed deficient performance.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.