State v. Gill’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo · 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“elements can be plucked out of one count in a charging document and dropped into another.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clowes · State v. Laramie“pull missing elements from one count and insert them into another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nonog
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.