<p>A plea of “Not guilty ” to a criminal complaint waives any objection to the complaint, either for misnomer or for neglect to add to the defendant's name the place where he is resident or co’mmoranfc.</p> <p>After a defendant had pleaded Not guilty ” to a complaint against him as John Doe, the court allowed the complaint to be amended by inserting his name.</p> <p>Meld, that the amendment, though superfluous, was no ground for exception.</p>
Cited in Anderson (1889)’s definition of “Gxttter”
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1882-01-28
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1980
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶1
The defendant was complained of under the name of John Doe, and being arraigned by that name, pleaded not guilty. He thereby waived the misnomer, and the Court of Common Pleas rightly refused to dismiss the complaint on account of it. 1 Bishop on Criminal Procedure, § 677. So, too, the objection to the complaint on account of the omission
*541
to add to the name of the defendant his place of residence, or commorancy, ought to haye been taken advantage of, if at all, by plea in abatement, or motion to quash, before the plea of not guilty was entered, the latter plea operating in legal effect as a waiver of the objection. 1 Bishop on Criminal Procedure, §
791; State
v.
McGregor,
41 N. H. 407; 2 Hale Pleas of the Crown, 176;
Johnson’s case,
Cro. Jac. 610. Nor do we deem it material that the court allowed the complaint to be amended, for the amendment, though superfluous, being confessedly according to the fact, can do the defendant no harm.
Samuel P. Colt,
Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff.
Wood Prendergast
and
John M. Brennan,
for defendant.
¶2
The exceptions are overruled, and the cause remanded for sentence.
Exceptions overruled.
