¶1The question in this case being, whether under the Act of Assembly, the Judge was alone authorized to decide on a question of caveat. On that question, I think the co’ursq pursued was illegal, therefore dissent from this opinion.
¶2--contra.
13 S.C.L. 191
Trapier v. Wilson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 15, 1822
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1822-05-15
Tried before Mr.. Justice Richardson, Georgetown* April, 1S22. On the day of 1820, Raul Trapier entered a caveat to prevent the emanation of a grant for 500 acres of land, upon a location made the 19th day of April, 1820, to John L: Wilson, because the said Paul Trapier claimed all the said land under a grant to Daniel and Thomas Laroche, dated the 11th day ofMay, 1739.
Decided 1822-05-15