Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 So. 3d 1154 - Conrad v. Lamarque Ford, Inc.

13 So. 3d 1154 - Conrad v. Lamarque Ford, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gomez v. Dade County School Board · Stearns v. City of Gig Harbor · Mullen v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC · 779 So. 2d 1070 - Duhe v. Texaco, Inc. · In re Incident

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test often used for adequate representation consists of three elements: (1) the chosen class representatives cannot have antagonistic or conflicting claims with other members of the class; (2) the named representatives must have a sufficient interest in the outcome to insure vigorous advocacy; and (3) counsel for the named plaintiffs must be competent, experienced, qualified, and generally able to conduct the proposed litigation vigorously.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.