13 So. 3d 616 - Everett v. Philibert’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 958 So. 2d 634 - Supreme Services v. Sonny Greer, Inc. · 454 So. 2d 1081 - Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc. · 641 So. 2d 1036 - Dubin v. Dubin · 439 So. 2d 489 - Franklin v. Able Moving & Storage Co., Inc. · In Re St. Louis Encephalitis Outbreak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This insurance does not apply and no duty to defend is provided by us for “bodily injury”, “property damage”, “personal injury” and “advertising injury” for claims, “suits”, accusations, charges or any loss, costs or expense, whether express or oral, for breach of contract, breach of an implied in law or implied in fact contract. This exclusion also applies to any additional insured under this policy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ll the tort claims alleged by the Everetts' stem from [the contractor's] contractual duty to properly and timely construct a residence [for the Everetts]. There is no showing of a breach of a general duty. The only allegations in the petition are for breaches of duty confected by contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“must arise from a duty other than one imposed by the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.