Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 So. 3d 621 - Armant v. Wilkerson

13 So. 3d 621 - Armant v. Wilkerson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Executive Office Centers, Inc. v. Cournoyer · 512 So. 2d 480 - Schoonmaker v. Capital Towing Co. · 3 So. 3d 512 - Martin v. Martin · 959 So. 2d 969 - Singleton v. Wilkinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen private prison contractors impose sentences on inmates at disciplinary hearings, there must be oversight and approval by DPSC, `clearly delineated by the presence of a DPSC official's initials on each disciplinary report that is reviewed,' in order to satisfy the statutory provisions of La. R.S. 39:1800,5.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No contract for correctional services shall authorize, allow, or imply a delegation of authority or responsibility to a prison contractor for any of the following: [[Image here]] (5) Granting, denying, or revoking sentence credits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.