13 So. 3d 633 - Taylor v. Babin’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on 62 Cal. App. 3d 389 - Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc. · Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, Division of Hospitals · 83 Ill. App. 3d 334 - Christison v. Jones · Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & Spivak · 637 So. 2d 127 - Montalvo v. Sondes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the action ... asserted in the amended petition ... arises out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of filing the original pleading.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[.Nathan and Guidry ] involved the in-heritability — not the assignability — of medical malpractice actions by a designated beneficiary, after the commencement of an action by the plaintiff tort victim through the filing of a suit or presuit complaint. In both cases, the [Louisiana] [S]upreme [C]ourt emphasized the fact that the patients had asserted their rights to recover by filing a claim prior to death, thus creating property rights that were inheritable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.