Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 So. 3d 77 - Taylor v. State

13 So. 3d 77 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 559 So. 2d 187 - State v. Law · 830 So. 2d 792 - Pagan v. State · Brown v. State · 677 So. 2d 258 - Orme v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such proof may consist either of evidence establishing that the accused had actual knowledge of the presence of the contraband in the place where it is found, or circumstantial evidence from which a jury might properly infer that the accused had knowledge of the presence of the contraband.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.