Roseborough v. Loftus’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1980
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our Supreme Court has said, ‘A contract includes not only what is expressly stated but also what is necessarily to be implied from the language used; and terms which may clearly be implied from a consideration of the entire contract are as much a part thereof as though plainly written on its face.’ Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co. of Texas, 117 Tex. 439 , 6 S.W.2d 1039, 1042 , 60 A.L.R. 890 . See also Roseborough v. Loftus, Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W.2d 950 , 952 and Marvin Drug Co. v. Couch, Tex.Civ.App., 134 S.W.2d 356, 361 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Dodge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.