Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 SW2D 974 - Largent v. Etheridge

Largent v. Etheridge’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1959
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1959

7 state decisions

501929193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros. · Cammack v. Rogers · 21 Tex. Civ. App. 260 - Weatherford v. McFadden · Wardlow v. Andrews · Saffle v. Jones County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The gravamen of appellant's complaint seems to be that the court, by its instructions to the jury, directed them to *Page 897 consider matters beyond the scope of appellee's pleading in arriving at their verdict. If the instructions had such effect and should be conceded to be error, the provisions of article 2185 supra, pronounce as the consequence of not having made timely objection to the giving of the instruction the taking of a proper bill of exception, and urging an assignment here to that effect, that such error is waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.