Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 S.W.3d 115 - Hall v. State

Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Ingalls v. Roosevelt County · Johnson v. Derwinski · King v. State · Administracion Nacional de Telecomunicaciones v. New Valley Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This statement clearly asks the jury to consider whether Appellant demonstrated remorse at any time, which necessarily refers to Appellant’s in-eourt demeanor as well. We ... hold that the prosecutor’s ... comment that Appellant has never shown remorse for his actions was clearly a direct comment on Appellant’s failure to testify. The necessary and natural effect of the prosecutor’s comments, viewed from the standpoint of the jury, was to direct the jury’s attention to the Appellant’s invocation of his right to remain silent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A comment that directly focuses the jury's attention on the defendant's personal feelings of remorse, which can only be supplied through the defendant's own testimony, necessarily indicates the defendant's failure to testify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.