Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 S.W.3d 434 - Nonn v. State

Nonn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Britt v. North Carolina · Jackson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I understand that I have the right to remain silent and that anything I say can be used against me in a court of law. I understand that I have the right to talk to a lawyer and have him present with me during questioning, and if I cannot afford to hire a lawyer one will be appointed by the court to represent me before any questioning. Understanding these rights, I wish to give a statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.