Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 SW3D 69 - Hayden v. State

Hayden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 115th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Kotteakos v. United States · Clewis v. State · Moreno v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he mere presence of an offense report indicating the State's awareness of the existence of such evidence does not indicate an `intent to introduce' such evidence in its case in chief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “reasonable notice ... given in advance of trial of intent to introduce....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reasonable notice of the intent to introduce.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.