Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 S.W.3d 89 - Mann v. State

Mann v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 368th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. State · Kutzner v. State · Mitchell v. State · Jones v. State · Tyra v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The evidence must demonstrate that the deadly weapon was used or exhibited “during the transaction from which” the felony conviction is obtained. To sustain a deadly weapon finding, there must be evidence that others were actually endangered, not “merely a hypothetical potential for danger if others had been present.” An automobile can be a deadly weapon if it is driven so as to endanger fives.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.