Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Tenn. 301

Haley v. Rowan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1833

Tennessee Supreme Court · decided 1833-12-15

This was an action of detinue brought by Rowan against Haley; plea, non-detinet. Upon trial it appeared that the plaintiff, Rowan, had loaned a mule to Henry Rowan to make a crop; Henry disposed of the mule to Haley. Demand was made of Haley of the mule, and.it was not delivered; whereupon this action was brought. Haley had sold the mule before '.a demand was made or suit brought.

Decided 1833-12-15

Peck, J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The plaintiff, Rowan, had loaned the mule to Henry Rowan to make a crop; he disposed of it to Haley. Demand was made of Haley, and this action brought. The question raised is, whether the action of detinue will lie, when the defendant had parted with the possession before demand and suit brought. The court charged in the affirmative of the proposition. On examination of authorities, we are of opinion the charge was right. 1 Chitty on *302Pleading, 120, 121, title Detinue: 1 Washington’s Rep. 12: Camer and Norwood, 464: 1 Hay. 12: 3 Starkie’s Evidence, 493.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/13/tenn/301 · .json · Public domain