Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Tenn. 452

Tansel v. Pepin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1830

Tennessee Supreme Court · decided 1830-03-15

The bill charges that the plaintiff and defendant were the securities of one Yerell, to the Bank of North Carolina, at Raleigh, in the sum of one hundred and ninety-eight dollars. That the manner of transacting business in that bank, was, for him who wished to have a note discounted, to have it executed by the principal and one of the securities, payable to the other security, whp endorsed to the bank. Tansel and Verell made the note to Pepin, who endorsed.

Decided 1830-03-15

Peck, J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The proof does not make-out the plaintiff’s case. The denial in the answer is as positive as the allegation in the bill. The proof is, as to what was the understanding of the witness. If one witness would, in such a case, be sufficient, his proof should be positive and direct of the fact, that they were securities, and that each was to be liable for one half. And this, because, on the face of the paper executed, they did not appear to stand in the same relative situation. To explain away the apparent contract, on the face of the paper executed, the evidence should be clear.

¶3Bill dismissed.

/13/tenn/452 · .json · Public domain