Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

13 Tex. Ct. App. 158

Kelly v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1882

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1882-11-11

Tried below before the Hon. T. M. Paschal. ■ The indictment in this case charged the appellant and George W. Harlan, jointly, with the theft of one certain head of neat cattle, the property of some person unknown. The venue was laid in Maverick county, and the date of the offense was alleged to be the twentieth day of July, 1882.

Decided 1882-11-11

Willson, J.

¶1The record in this case fails to show that the jurors who tried the case were sworn. Repeated decisions of the Supreme Court of this State, and of this court, declare such an omission to be fatal to the conviction. (Nels v. The State, 2 Texas, 280; Baird v. The State, 38 Texas, 599; Cannon v. The State, 5 Texas Ct. App., 34; Kennon v. The State, 7 Texas Ct. App., 326; Howard v. The State, 8 Texas Ct. App., 612; Berry v. The State, 10 Texas Ct. App., 315.)

¶2We are of the opinion that the defendant’s plea to the jurisdiction was properly overruled. The defendant was extradited from Mexico for the offense of theft of cattle, and was tried for and convicted of that offense. There appear some irregularities in the proceedings had to obtain the requisition, but it does not appear that the extradition was fraudulently or wrongfully obtained, or that it was in violation of the treaty between the United States and Mexico. The case is essentially different from Blandford v. The State, 10 Texas Ct. App., 627.

¶3Because the record does not show that the jury was sworn, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

¶5Opinion delivered November 11, 1882.

/13/texctapp/158 · .json · Public domain