¶1Defendant was convicted of a violation of the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of fifty *374dollars, under an instruction contained in the charge of the court that, if the jury found the defendant guilty, they would assess his punishment at a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than two hundred dollars. This was radical error for which the judgment must be reversed. The minimum punishment for this offense prescribed by law is a fine of twenty-five instead of fifty dollars. (Penal Code, Art. 378.) This article of the Code is the law in force,.and which was in force at the time of the offense and of the trial. (Robertson v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 541.)
¶2It further appears that during the pendency of this appeal the local option law has been annulled and rescinded in Polk county in the manner required by law. This being the case, there would be no support for the judgment of conviction, if it were in all other respects valid. (Fitze v. The State, decided at this term, and authorities there cited, ante, p. 372.)
¶3The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.
¶4Reversed and dismissed,
¶5Opinion delivered January 27, 1883.