Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 U.S. 289 - The Brig Ann

The Brig Ann’s Empirical Analysis

13 U.S. 289 · 1815

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 28 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2018 · most notably United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property (1993), Continental Grain Company v. The Fbl-585 (1960)

40 federal appellate · 28 district · 6 state decisions

190181518201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]efore judicial cognizance can attach upon a forfeiture in rem, ... there must be a seizure; for until seizure it is impossible to ascertain what is the competent forum.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'in order to institute and perfect proceedings in rem, ... the thing should be actually or constructively within the reach of the Court.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to purge away all the prior rights acquired by the seizure,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.