Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Utah 2d 105 - Nunley v. Walker

13 Utah 2d 105 - Nunley v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2012

12 state decisions

40196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tripp v. Bagley · Holmes v. Judge · Brown v. Milliner · 1 Utah 2d 237 - Hummel v. Young · 10 Utah 2d 370 - Harding v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[I)f there is no uncertainty as to the location of the true boundary line the parties may not, knowing where the true boundary line is, establish a boundary line by acquiescence at another place'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.