Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Utah 2d 168 - Smoot v. Lund

13 Utah 2d 168 - Smoot v. Lund’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2006

2 district · 16 state decisions

6019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 7 Utah 2d 163 - Ephraim Theatre Company v. Hawk · Evans v. Gaisford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... [A lawyer's] fiduciary duty is of the highest order and he must not represent interests adverse to those of the client. It is also true that because of his professional responsibility and the confidence and trust which his client may legitimately repose in him, he must adhere to a high standard of honesty, integrity and good faith in dealing with his client. He is not permitted to take advantage of his position or superior knowledge to impose upon the client; nor to conceal facts or law, nor in any way deceive him without being held responsible therefor." (p. 172.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(e) Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency. (1) Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. (2) . . .A party may also state as many separate claims or defenses as he has regardless of consistency and whether based on legal or on equitable grounds or on both. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.