Anderson v. Utah County’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2021
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 3 Utah 2d 7 - W. S. Hatch Co. v. Public Service Commission of Utah · United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomlinson-Arkwright Co. · 11 Utah 2d 196 - Stone v. Salt Lake City · Bigger v. Unemployment Compensation Commission · Rowley v. Public Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is a general rule that where a statute is ambiguous in terms and fairly susceptible of two constructions, the unreasonableness or absurdity which may follow one construction or the other may properly be considered. Unreasonable, absurd, or ridiculous consequences should be avoided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.