Fritz v. West’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 38 U.S.C. § 5904 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252 · 38 U.S.C. § 7263
Relies on Cox v. West · Stillwell v. Brown · Bazalo v. West · Wick v. Brown · 10 Vet. App. 361 - In re the Fee Agreement of Cox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has the burden of proving that [his] position was substantially justified in order to defeat the appellant's EAJA application”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Swiney v. Gober“a significant possibility of confusing or misleading the client”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fritz v. Principi
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.