Lee v. West’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1715Z · 16 U.S.C. § 499 · 16 U.S.C. § 939 · 25 U.S.C. § 305A · 29 U.S.C. § 527 · 30 U.S.C. § 1013 · 33 U.S.C. § 1361 · 33 U.S.C. § 702A
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Russello v. United States · Lynch v. United States · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · Brown v. Gardner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Gardner v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 584, 586-87 (1991) (citations omitted), aff'd sub nom. Gardner v. Brown, 5 F.3d 1456 (Fed. Cir. 1993), aff'd, 513 U.S. 115 (1994). Determining the plain meaning of a statute”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holliday v. Principi“any issuance by the Secretary of . . . regulations . . . may not be inconsistent with the statutory authority granted”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ozer v. Principi“[T]he construction of a life insurance policy issued by the United States is governed by federal law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.