Sullivan v. Treen’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1928
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gates v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In our opinion the parties intended to be protected from the force of the statute allowing such amendments were- only those who had acquired some interest subsequent to the filing of the lien notice,-and had no reference to those whose relations to the property had not been changed since such filing.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rose v. O'Reilly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.