¶1This is a proceeding in quo warranto, and involves the validity of the organization and existence of the town of Water-ville, as a municipal corporation. This is the only question presented, and as it has been heretofore expressly decided by this court in Pullman v. Hungate, 8 Wash. 519 (36 Pac. 483), and-subsequently affirmed in State ex. rel. Rice, v. Centralia, 8 Wash. 659 (36 Pac. 484), and Abernethy v. Medical Lake, 9 Wash. 112 (37 Pac. 306), and as we are satisfied therewith, we decline to enter upon any further discussion of the question, and affirm the judgment rendered in the lower court .herein.
13 Wash. 708
State ex rel. Bradley v. Berry
Decided November 11, 1895
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1895-11-11
<p>Appeal from Superior Court, Douglas County.—Hon. Wallace Mount, Judge.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1941
2 state decisions
Relies on Abernethy v. Town of Medical Lake · City of Pullman v. Hungate · State ex rel. Rice v. City of Centralia
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1895-11-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →