13 Wash. App. 142 - Moen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2019
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 71 Wash. 2d 126 - Thorgaard Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. County of King · 63 Wash. 2d 245 - Northern State Construction Co. v. Banchero · School District No. 5 v. Sage · Hatch v. Cole · 1 Wash. Terr. 107 - Bachelder v. Wallace
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any of the following cases the court shall after notice and hearing make an order vacating the award, upon the application of any party to the arbitration: (4) Where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The legislature has also provided, as we have seen, that awards may be set aside for error in fact or law, but inasmuch as there is no provision in the statute requiring arbitrators to file or preserve the evidence received upon the hearing, it would seem to follow that the errors which will sustain an exception to an award on the ground indicated must be discovered by an examination of the award alone. If it was the intention of the legislature to require the court, upon hearing exceptions taken to awards, to examine the evidence submitted to the arbitrators, or, in other words, to try the cause de novo, it is but reasonable to presume that they would have so declared. . . . [T]he errors and mistakes contemplated by the statute must appear on the face of the award, or, at least, in some paper delivered with it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“unless the court is satisfied that substantial rights of the parties were prejudiced thereby.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.