Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Wash. App. 239 - State v. Harp

13 Wash. App. 239 - State v. Harp’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
9
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2005

24 state decisions

1101975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 82 Wash. 2d 577 - State v. Roybal · 83 Wash. 2d 424 - State v. Gluck · 60 Wash. 2d 21 - State v. Johnson · 5 Wash. 2d 234 - State v. Barton · 9 Wash. App. 529 - State v. Waldenburg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Whenever a person is convicted of two or more offenses which arise from a single act or omission, the sentences imposed therefor shall run concurrently, unless the court, in pronouncing sentence, expressly orders the service of said sentences to be consecutive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.