13 Wash. App. 675 - State v. Durham’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2010
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 81 Wash. 2d 259 - State v. Reader's Digest Ass'n · 85 Wash. 2d 29 - State v. Williams · 38 Wash. 2d 774 - State v. Thompson · 84 Wash. 2d 203 - State v. Sponburgh · 79 Wash. 2d 406 - Jordan v. O'BRIEN
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] rule of court must be construed so that no word, clause or sentence is superfluous, void or insignificant.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he time between the dismissal and the refiling of the same charge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) ... It shall be the responsibility of the court to insure to each person charged with crime a speedy trial in accordance with the provisions of this rule. (b) . . . A criminal charge shall be brought to trial within 90 days following the preliminary appearance. (d) . . . The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time for trial: (5) . . . The time between the dismissal and the refiling of the same charge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.