Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Wash. App. 782 - State v. Clark

13 Wash. App. 782 - State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably 30 Wash. App. 653 - State v. Rogers (1981), State v. Ellis (1992)

36 state decisions

12019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 Wash. 2d 457 - McCurdy v. Union Pacific Railroad · 40 Wash. 2d 238 - Donaldson v. Greenwood · 9 Wash. App. 766 - State v. Johnson · 233 Cal. App. 2d 435 - People v. Cook · 2 Wash. App. 824 - State v. Melrose

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Market value” is defined in this state as the price which a well-informed buyer would pay to a well-informed seller, where neither is obliged to enter into the transaction.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the property has a market value the evidence must be limited to such value, at the time and place of the offense or at a nearby place, but evidence of value at a distant point is not competent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]t has been held that evidence of the purchase price, selling price, and the condition of the property when stolen is admissible, especially when the property has been used but a short while.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.