Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 13 Wis. 2d 369 - Bond v. Harrel

13 Wis. 2d 369 - Bond v. Harrel’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
4
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably 144 Wis. 2d 188 - Pamperin v. Trinity Memorial Hospital (1988), Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc. (1978)

3 federal appellate · 27 state decisions

140196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · James v. Tobin-Sutton Co. · Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial Commission · Madix v. Hochgreve Brewing Co. · Kruse v. Weigand

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) “the express or implied manifestátion of one party that the other party shall act for him;” (2) “who has retained the right to control the details of the workand (3) “whether the party agreeing to perform the service is engaged in a distinct occupation or business apart from that of the person who engages the services.” [Footnote omitted.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(3) An independent contractor is a person who contracts with another to do something for him but who is not controlled by the other nor subject to the other’s right to control with respect to his physical conduct in the performance of the undertaking. He may or may not be an agent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““. . . if the material facts are not in dispute and if the inferences which may reasonably be drawn from the facts are not doubtful and lead to only one conclusion, then only a matter of law is presented which should be decided upon the motion.” 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.