Paschong v. Hollenbeck’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably 65 Wis. 2d 331 - Bailey v. State (1974), 80 Wis. 2d 64 - Dugenske v. Dugenske (1977)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Laun v. Kipp · Duenow v. Lindeman · Whereatt v. Ellis · Fischbeck v. Mielenz · Hart v. Godkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In deciding whether to impute the negligence of the lawyer to the client, the trial court must exercise 'its equitable powers to secure substantial jus tice between the parties.' This discretion may or may not call for imputation, depending on the facts of each case.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[mjistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“may constitute excusable neglect on the part of the client, when the client has acted as a reasonable and prudent person in engaging a lawyer of good reputation, has relied upon him to protect his rights, and has made a reasonable inquiry concerning the proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.