Starling v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Bagley · Kyles v. Whitley · Harrington v. Richter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court notes that the Superior Court properly applied the version of Rule 61 in effect in 20-13 when Brochu filed his postconviction motion.”); Starling v. State, 130 A.3d 316 , 332 n. 95, 2015 WL 8758197 , at n. 95 (Del.2015) (citing Collins v. State, 2014 WL 2609107 , at (Del. June 9, 2014); State v. Jones, 2013 WL 5372415 , at (Del. Sept. 24, 2013)) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bradley v. State“) 15 and (2) there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Baynum v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.