Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 ALA 132 - Dannelley v. State

Dannelley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 1971
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1971

19 state decisions

8019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Farmer · Comer & Co. v. Way & Edmundson · Dominick v. State · Brinson v. Edwards · Andrews v. Birmingham Mineral Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The majority of the court are of the opinion that, in view of the recital of the judgment entry above copied, it must be held that the only issue in the case was upon the plea of not guilty, and, the jury having responded to this issue, that the judgment must be affirmed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.