Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 Ariz. 103 - State v. Vasquez

State v. Vasquez’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2004

20 state decisions

100198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Florida · Beaufort Concrete Company v. Atlantic States Construction Company · Montellano v. United States · State v. Tison · State v. Narten

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We are ohly justified in disturbing the verdict of guilty on account of the alleged misconduct of a juror when it is shown that such misconduct was prejudicial to the rights of the defendant, or when such a state of facts is shown that it may fairly be presumed therefrom that the defendant's rights were prejudiced." State v. Adams, 27 Ariz. App. 389, 392 , 555 P.2d 358, 361 (1976).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.