State v. Pope’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1981
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. · State v. Gause · State v. Savage · State v. Byers · 27 Ariz. App. 309 - State v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““a. Motion for Rehearing; Response; Reply. Any party aggrieved by a final decision of the trial court in these proceedings may, within 10 days after the ruling of the court, move the court for a rehearing setting forth in detail the grounds wherein it is believed the court erred. There shall be a response filed within 10 days and reply within 10 days.” Rule 32.9(a), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pope““Prior decisions of the Arizona courts have clearly established that the timely filing of the motion for rehearing required by Rule 32.9(a) and a petition for review in accordance with the provisions of Rule 32.9(c), are jurisdictional prerequisites to review by this court of trial court dispositions in post-conviction relief proceedings. * * * ” State v. Pope, Ariz., ’ 635 P.2d 861, 862 (App.1981).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pope
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.