Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 ARK 234 - Parker v. State

Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1991

13 state decisions

50191719201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Huffman v. State · Roberts v. State · State v. . Godwin · State v. Wilson · Butte Electric Railway Co. v. Mathews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘By his plea of not guilty, the defendant must be understood as denying the truth of the information or indictment, and as not conceding the truth of what the witnesses for the government have sworn to. This is so notwithstanding the fact that no witness for the defendant contradicted the statements of the witnesses for the prosecution. In this condition of the testimony it was the right of the jury to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses, even if unimpeached as to character, and to consider whether, upon applying all the tests of manner, clear or confused statement, prejudice and accuracy of memory, they were to be believed; It was within the. province of the jury to disbelieve the witnesses for the government.’ See also Territory v. Kee (N. M.), 25 Pac. 924 ; State v. Wilson, 62 Kan. 621 , 52 L. R. A. 679; State v. Godman, 145 N. C. 461 , 123 A. S. R. 467; Huffman v. State, 29 Ala. 40 ; Thompson on Trials (2 Ed.), vol. 2, sec. 2149.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.