¶1I concur in the reasoning of the opinion by the Chief Justice. The statute clearly invades the Constitution of the United States and of our own State, but the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States construing a similar statute is controlling on the issue before us. The litigants are entitled to the benefits of the law as declared by that court on the subject until it holds otherwise. Therefore I concur in the judgment.
130 Ark. 272
State v. Crowe
Decided June 4, 1917
Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1917-06-04
The act was legally passed. It was enrolled, signed by tbe President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House, approved by the Governor and filed with the Secretary of State. 34 Ark. 283; 110 Id. 273. 2. The act does not violate section 2, article 2, Constitution of Arkansas. 58 Ark. 414. It does not deprive the employer of any constitutional right. Under the police power of the State, the act is valid. 58 Ark. 414; 94 U. S.. 113; 143 Id. 517; 125 Id. 680; 49 Ark. 325; 3 Ala.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
reversed · Decided 1917-06-04
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 1970 · most notably Adkins v. Children's Hospital of the District of Columbia Same (1923), Williams v. Evans (1917)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 29 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →