Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 Cal. 392 - Freiermuth v. Steigleman

Freiermuth v. Steigleman’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
January 1985
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 1985

21 state decisions

60190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burkett v. Burkett · Gleason v. Spray · Merced Bank v. Rosenthal · In re Estate of Lamb · Dolbeer v. Livingston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of the law [Civ. Code, § 1242] is to place it beyond the power of either spouse, acting alone, to destroy the homestead character impressed upon the real estate or encumber it in any way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.